Quantum Walks Speed Information Through Wormholes

A recent theoretical study explores how quantum random walks can enhance information transmission through wormholes, leveraging interference effects for exponential speedups over classical approaches. This work connects quantum mechanics and general relativity, offering a fresh perspective on traversable wormholes in holographic systems.

Key Finding Quantum random walks enable exponentially faster information transfer through wormholes compared to ballistic motion in specific geometries, such as the glued trees graph, by exploiting interference phenomena.

Methodology The research models spacetime geometries as graphs, where vertices represent regions and edges correspond to wormholes with weights based on throat areas. Quantum random walks are applied to these graphs, simulating particle propagation. The study uses the AdS/CFT correspondence to relate boundary quantum field theories to bulk gravitational theories, with traversability achieved via trace deformations that introduce negative energy shocks.

Results Analysis In the glued trees graph example, quantum random walks traverse the graph in polynomial time, while classical methods require exponential time. This speedup arises from interference allowing efficient navigation through complex structures. For superpositions of geometries, information transmission capacity can be nonzero even when dominant classical saddles have zero capacity, as subdominant connected geometries contribute.

Context The authors aim to study interference in wormholes with low-energy, diffuse signals, avoiding the high-density limitations of previous models. This approach generalizes entanglement-assisted quantum channels, where shared entanglement between boundaries facilitates communication, and aligns with holographic principles linking geometry to quantum information.

Limitations The analysis assumes the number of superposed geometries is below an exponential bound in central charge to maintain computational control; beyond this, off-diagonal terms become significant and complicate the model. Additionally, the method may not apply to unentangled states, where capacity is typically zero, and extensions to dynamical spacetimes with time-dependent graphs are left for future work.

References [1] J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999). [2] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998). [3] M. S. Morris et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988). [4] P. Gao et al., JHEP 12, 151 (2017). [5] J. Maldacena et al., Fortsch. Phys. 65, 1700034 (2017). [6] C. H. Bennett et al., IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 49, 1895 (2003). [7] N. Bao et al., JHEP 11, 071 (2018). [8] J. Maldacena and X.-L. Qi, arXiv:1804.00423. [9] H. Tang et al., Sci. Adv. 4, eaat3174 (2018). [10] J. Kempe, Contemp. Phys. 44, 307 (2003). [11] A. M. Childs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180501 (2009). [12] A. Almheiri et al., JHEP 2017, 74 (2017). [13] A. M. Childs and J. Goldstone, Phys. Rev. A 70, 022314 (2004). [14] S. Aaronson and A. Ambainis, SIAM J. Comput. 47, 982 (2018). [15] A. M. Childs et al., Quantum Inf. Process. 1, 35 (2002). [16] J. Maldacena, JHEP 2003, 021 (2003). [17] S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JHEP 03, 067 (2014). [18] M. Bañados et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992). [19] N. Bao et al., Fortsch. Phys. 63, 705 (2015). [20] J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Fortsch. Phys. 61, 781 (2013). [21] N. Bao et al., JHEP 11, 126 (2015). [22] G. Remmen et al., JHEP 07, 048 (2016). [23] C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3081 (1999). [24] C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993). [25] M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2011). [26] N. Bao and G. N. Remmen, EPL 121, 60007 (2018). [27] N. Bao et al., JHEP 2015, 130 (2015). [28] V. E. Hubeny et al., Fortsch. Phys. 66, 1800067 (2018). [29] V. E. Hubeny et al., arXiv:1812.08133. [30] V. Balasubramanian et al., Class. Quantum Gravity 31, 185015 (2014). [31] D. R. Brill, Phys. Rev. D 53, 4133 (1996). [32] D. Brill, Lect. Notes Phys. 537, 143 (2000). [33] S. Aminneborg et al., Class. Quantum Grav. 15, 627 (1998). [34] D. Marolf et al., JHEP 2017, 69 (2017). [35] S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 577 (1983). [36] E. Witten, arXiv:hep-th/9803131. [37] P. Caputa et al., JHEP 2017, 97 (2017). [38] T. Takayanagi, JHEP 2018, 48 (2018). [39] N. Bao et al., arXiv:1903.12044. [40] B. Swingle, Phys. Rev. D 86, 065007 (2012). [41] F. Pastawski et al., JHEP 2015, 149 (2015). [42] X.-L. Qi, arXiv:1309.6282. [43] P. Hayden et al., JHEP 2016, 9 (2016). [44] N. Bao et al., arXiv:1902.10157. [45] N. Bao et al., arXiv:1812.01171. [46] T. Kohler and T. Cubitt, arXiv:1810.08992. [47] N. Bao et al., Phys. Rev. D 91, 125036 (2015). [48] A. Almheiri et al., JHEP 2015, 163 (2015). [49] X. Dong et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 021601 (2016). [50] J. Cotler et al., arXiv:1704.05839. [51] P. Hayden and G. Penington, arXiv:1807.06041. [52] C. Akers and P. Rath, JHEP 2019, 124 (2019).