Revisiting de Broglie's Hidden Quantum Theory

Quantum mechanics has long been viewed as an incomplete theory, with the standard Copenhagen interpretation leaving gaps in explaining physical reality. A recent review by Aurélien Drezet revisits Louis de Broglie's double solution program (DSP), a historical approach that proposes particles are guided by waves, aiming to resolve quantum paradoxes like Schrödinger's cat and Wigner's friend. This work highlights de Broglie's guidance theorem from 1927, which shows how singular wave solutions pilot particles through phase locking, yet it remains overlooked in modern interpretations like Bohmian mechanics.

De Broglie developed the DSP between 1924 and 1928, focusing on singular solutions of linear wave equations that evolve in Minkowski space-time. In this framework, particles act as localized clocks continuously phase-locked to a guiding quantum wave, directing their paths without the indeterminism of mainstream quantum theory. The guidance theorem specifically demonstrates that these singular waves are piloted by the phase of the guiding field, providing a deterministic mechanism absent in other interpretations.

However, de Broglie rejected the pilot-wave interpretation (PWI), later favored by David Bohm, which treats particles as point-like objects moving in a guiding field without field singularities. Bohm's causal interpretation, known as Bohmian mechanics, extends to many-body problems in non-relativistic quantum mechanics and aligns with standard predictions, including quantum nonlocality and entanglement. De Broglie, however, found this approach too simplistic, preferring the DSP for its deeper mechanical basis, though it struggles with nonlocality issues.

The DSP has regained interest recently, partly due to analogies with bouncing droplet experiments, such as those by J.W.M. Bush, which mimic wave-particle behavior. Despite this, the DSP is still a research program fraught with mathematical difficulties and an inability to fully justify nonlocality, unlike Bohmian mechanics. Drezet's review does not solve these problems but aims to show that the DSP could be completed, emphasizing its potential to offer a more intuitive understanding of quantum phenomena.

This exploration underscores ongoing debates in quantum foundations, where alternatives to Copenhagen interpretations seek to clarify what happens between measurements. By revisiting de Broglie's original ideas, researchers hope to bridge gaps in quantum theory, potentially influencing future developments in physics and technology.

References: [1] L. de Broglie, C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 177, 507 (1923). [2] L. de Broglie, Recherches sur la théorie des quanta, Paris 1924. [3] L. de Broglie, Ondes et mouvements, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1926. [4] L. de Broglie, J. Phys. Radium 7, 321 (1926). [5] D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952). [6] D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 180 (1952). [7] J.W.M. Bush, Phys. Today 68, 47 (2015). [8] J.W.M. Bush, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 269 (2015). [9] D. Fargue, in The wave-particle dualism, p. 149, D. Reidel Publishing, 1984. [10] D. Fargue, Ann. Fond. de Broglie 42, 9 (2017). [11] S. Collin, T. Durt, R. Willox, Ann. Fond. de Broglie 42, 19 (2017). [12] L. de Broglie, in Electrons et photons, p. 105, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1928. [13] D. Bohm and B.J. Hiley, The undivided Universe, Routledge, London, 1993. [14] L. de Broglie, La mécanique ondulatoire, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1928. [15] L. de Broglie, Introduction à l'étude de la mécanique ondulatoire, Hermann, Paris, 1930. [16] L. de Broglie, La théorie de la mesure en mécanique ondulatoire, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1957. [17] E. Madelung, Z. Phys. 40, 322 (1927). [18] A. Drezet, Ann. Fond. de Broglie 42, 103 (2017). [19] A. Drezet, Ann. Fond. de Broglie 43, 23 (2018). [20] L. de Broglie and J.P. Vigier, La physique quantique restera-t-elle indéterministe?, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1953. [21] J.P. Vigier, Structure des micro-objets dans l'interprétation causale de la théorie des quanta, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1956. [22] L. de Broglie, C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. B (Paris) 263, 589 (1966). [23] M. Born, Ann. Phys. 30, 1 (1909). [24] E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 23, 340 (1922). [25] F. Fer, Les solutions singulières d'équations d'onde et la théorie de la double solution, Faculté des sciences de l'université de Paris, 1956. [26] A. Einstein and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 48, 73 (1935). [27] D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2064 (1995). [28] A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. 17, 132 (1905). [29] A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. 17, 891 (1905). [30] A. Einstein, Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917). [31] A. Einstein, Z. Phys. 10, 817 (1909). [32] M. Born, Z. Phys. 38, 803 (1927). [33] D. Howard, in Sixty years of uncertainty, p. 61, Plenum Press, New York, 1990. [34] H. Tetrode, Z. Phys. 10, 317 (1922). [35] L. Page, Phys. Rev. 18, 292 (1921). [36] A.D. Fokker, Z. Phys. 58, 386 (1929). [37] J.A. Wheeler and R.P. Feynman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157 (1945). [38] F. Hoyle and J.V. Narlikar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 113 (1995). [39] O. Costa de Beauregard, C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 236, 1632 (1953). [40] O. Costa de Beauregard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 867 (1983). [41] H. Kragh, Am. J. Phys. 52, 1024 (1984). [42] L. de Broglie, C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 179, 1039 (1924). [43] L. de Broglie, J. Phys. Radium 7, 1 (1926). [44] J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed., Wiley and Sons, New York, 1999. [45] M. Born, Ann. Phys. 30, 1 (1909). [46] E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 23, 340 (1922).